Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 5 , Pages 575-584, May 2010

A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease

  • Ole M. Ekeberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0407 Oslo, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0407 Oslo, Norway. Tel.: +47-23027444; fax: +47-23027455.
  • ,
  • Erik Bautz-Holter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0407 Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Anne Keller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0407 Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Einar K. Tveitå

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0407 Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Niels G. Juel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0407 Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Jens I. Brox

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, Back Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0027 Oslo, Norway

Accepted 3 July 2009. published online 16 October 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To compare responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the disease-specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and the two region-specific questionnaires Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) in patients with rotator cuff disease receiving corticosteroid injection therapy.

Study Design and Setting

One hundred twenty-one patients with rotator cuff disease. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, SPADI, and OSS were administered before treatment and at 2 and 6 weeks after corticosteroid injection. Responsiveness was compared between questionnaires using the standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and reliable change proportion (RCP) statistics. Minimal clinically important change estimates were reported.

Results

The differences between questionnaires were small and not consistent across the different responsiveness indices. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than OSS measured by SRM and RCP at 2 and 6 weeks. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index was significantly more responsive than OSS in RCP and area under receiver operating characteristic curve at 6 weeks. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than WORC measured by RCP at 2 weeks. Minimal clinically important change was estimated to 5, 275, and 20 points for OSS, WORC, and SPADI, respectively.

Conclusions

All questionnaires are suitable for measuring change in patients with rotator cuff disease. Disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than the region-specific SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease.

Keywords: Responsiveness, Minimal clinically important change, Rotator cuff disease, SPADI, OSS, WORC

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(09)00225-X

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.012

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 5 , Pages 575-584, May 2010