Executive function (capacity for behavioral self-regulation) and decline predicted mortality in a longitudinal study in Southern Colorado
Abstract
Objective
To assess the relationship between mortality and impairment and decline in a specific executive cognitive function, the capacity for behavioral self-regulation.
Study Design and Setting
This study examined the association between mortality and baseline and 22-month decline in the capacity for behavioral self-regulation, as measured by the Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale, among 1,293 participants of the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study (SLVHAS), a population-based longitudinal study. The Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale and a measure of overall mental status, the Mini-Mental State Examination, were administered at baseline and follow-up interviews. Cox regression was used to examine baseline and decline in capacity for behavioral self-regulation as possible predictors of mortality.
Results
Baseline Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale score was predictive of mortality, independent of demographics and comorbidity count (hazard ratio [HR]
=
1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04, 1.09). It remained a significant predictor with further adjustment for Mini-Mental State Examination score. Decline in this specific executive cognitive function was associated with mortality after adjustment for covariates and baseline cognitive scores (HR
=
1.09; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.13).
Conclusion
Thus, both baseline capacity for behavioral self-regulation and its decline over time predicted mortality in the SLVHAS cohort. These associations may partly be attributed to maintaining the ability for self-care. Understanding how specific forms of impairment contribute to mortality may help identify patients who could benefit from early intervention.
Keywords: Executive cognitive function, Cognitive impairment, Cognitive decline, Mortality, Hispanic, San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0895-4356(09)00177-2
doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.004
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
