« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 3
, Pages 289-298
, March 2010
Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy
References
- . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900
- . Inter-reader variation. Available at http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clcmr/articles/CMR-660/frame.html1997;278. (Accessed Nov 15, 2008)
- . High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:741–742
- . Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:697–703
- . Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences. JAMA. 2007;298:430–437
- . A comparison of placebo effects in clinical analgesic trials versus studies of placebo analgesia. Pain. 2002;99:443–452
- . Unsubstantiated claims of large effects of placebo on pain: serious errors in meta-analysis of placebo analgesia mechanism studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(4):336–338
- . Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10:329–337
- Manifestations and management of chronic insomnia in adults. Evid Rep Technol Assess No. 125. (Summ). June 2005;1–10
- . Efficacy and safety of Zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia. Curr Ther Res. 1987;42:665–670
- . The acceptability of a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic in general practice. J Int Med Res. 1983;11:333–337
- . The dose effects of Zopiclone. Hum Psychopharmacol. 1989;4:41–46
PII: S0895-4356(09)00128-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.007
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 3
, Pages 289-298
, March 2010
