Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 60, Issue 11 , Pages 1105-1115, November 2007

A meta-analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence

  • Saskia F.A. Duijts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31-43-388-2368; fax: +31-43-388-4128.
  • ,
  • Ijmert Kant

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Gerard M.H. Swaen

      Affiliations

    • Dow Chemical Terneuzen, Terneuzen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Piet A. van den Brandt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Maurice P.A. Zeegers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Accepted 21 April 2007. published online 24 August 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

About one in every three employees seen by their occupational physician is absent from work because of psychosocial health complaints. To implement preventive measures, it is necessary to identify predictors for this type of sickness absence.

Study Design and Setting

A meta-analysis was carried out to quantify the association between predictive factors and psychosocial sickness absence and to assess clinical outcomes and heterogeneity. Eligible for inclusion were prospective studies that examined this association and provided sufficient information to estimate summary odds ratios (SORs).

Results

Twenty prospective studies were included. Significant SORs for sick leave >3 days were found for being unmarried, 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15–1.64), experiencing psychosomatic complaints, 1.79 (95% CI=1.54–2.07), using medication, 3.13 (95% CI=1.71–5.72), having a burnout, 2.34 (95% CI=1.59–3.45), suffering from psychological problems, 1.97 (95% CI=1.37–2.85), having low job control, 1.28 (95% CI=1.23–1.33), having low decision latitude, 1.33 (95% CI=1.16–1.56), and experiencing no fairness at work, 1.30 (95% CI=1.18–1.45).

Conclusion

This study shows that predictors of sickness absence can be identified in a homogeneous manner. The results provide leads to public health interventions to successfully improve psychosocial health and to reduce sickness absence.

Keywords: Meta-analysis, Predictor, Sickness absence, Observational

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by the Health Research and Development Council (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland).

PII: S0895-4356(07)00148-5

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.008

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 60, Issue 11 , Pages 1105-1115, November 2007