Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 60, Issue 11 , Pages 1116-1122, November 2007

The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed

  • A. Van den Bruel

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
    • Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium
    • CEBAM, Belgian Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Ann Van den Bruel, Academic Centre of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok J, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel.: +32-16-33-74-90; fax: +32-16-33-74-80.
  • ,
  • I. Cleemput

      Affiliations

    • Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • B. Aertgeerts

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
    • CEBAM, Belgian Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • D. Ramaekers

      Affiliations

    • Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium
    • CEBAM, Belgian Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • F. Buntinx

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
    • Department of General Practice, Universiteit Maastricht, the Netherlands
    • CEBAM, Belgian Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Leuven, Belgium

Accepted 13 March 2007. published online 30 August 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

Before introducing a test in clinical practice, its characteristics and added value should be assessed. Diagnostic accuracy studies only are not sufficient; the test's impact on patient outcome ought to be assessed as well. To do this, we propose a stepwise evaluation of diagnostic tests.

Study Design and Setting

Theoretical–conceptual approach.

Results

First, the test's technical accuracy refers to the ability to produce usable information under standardized conditions. In a second step, the place of the new test in the clinical pathway is determined. Thirdly, the test's diagnostic accuracy is assessed, depending on its intended goal. The fourth step assesses the test's impact on the patient outcome. Depending on the place of the test in the clinical pathway, existing evidence can be used, or new evidence will be needed. At the final step, a cost-effectiveness analysis assesses the test's financial and societal consequences.

Conclusion

Diagnostic tests evaluation should consider the technical accuracy, the test's place in the clinical pathway, its diagnostic accuracy, and its impact on patient outcome.

Keywords: Diagnostic test, Technology assessment, Design, Accuracy, Patient outcome, Cost-effectiveness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(07)00145-X

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.015

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 60, Issue 11 , Pages 1116-1122, November 2007