Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 59, Issue 11 , Pages 1134-1149, November 2006

Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration

  • Joel J. Gagnier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 5955 Ontario Street, Unit #307, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N8S1W6. Tel.: +1-519-974-9690; fax: +1-519-258-2396.
  • ,
  • Heather Boon

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Paula Rochon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • David Moher

      Affiliations

    • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
    • Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Joanne Barnes

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Pharmacognosy & Phytotherapy, School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Claire Bombardier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • for the CONSORT Group

      Affiliations

    • Members of this group are listed in Section 8.

Accepted 16 December 2005.

Abstract 

Controlled trials that use randomized allocation are the best tool to control for bias and confounding in trials testing clinical interventions. Investigators must be sure to include information that is required by the reader to judge the validity and implications of the findings in the reports of these trials. In part, complete reporting of trials will allow clinicians to modify their clinical practice to reflect current evidence toward the improvement of clinical outcomes. The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statement was developed to assist investigators, authors, reviewers, and editors on the necessary information to be included in reports of controlled clinical trials. The CONSORT statement is applicable to any intervention, including herbal medicinal products. Controlled trials of herbal interventions do not adequately report the information suggested in CONSORT. Recently, reporting recommendations were developed in which several CONSORT items were elaborated to become relevant and complete for randomized controlled trials of herbal medicines. We expect that these recommendations will lead to more complete and accurate reporting of herbal trials. We wrote this explanatory document to outline the rationale for each recommendation and to assist authors in using them by providing the CONSORT items and the associated elaboration, together with examples of good reporting and empirical evidence, where available, for each. These recommendations for the reporting of herbal medicinal products presented here are open to revision as more evidence accumulates and critical comments are collected.

Keywords: Reporting recommendations, CONSORT statement, Herbal medicines, Randomized controlled trials, Consensus technique

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(06)00250-2

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.020

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 59, Issue 11 , Pages 1134-1149, November 2006