Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 60, Issue 1 , Pages 34-42 , January 2007

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

  • Caroline B. Terwee

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31-20-4448187; fax: +31-20-4446775.
  • ,
  • Sandra D.M. Bot

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Michael R. de Boer

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of General Practice, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Dirk L. Knol

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Joost Dekker

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Lex M. Bouter

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Henrica C.W. de Vet

      Affiliations

    • EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands

,Accepted 29 March 2006.

References 

  1. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335–341
  2. Jorstad EC, Hauer K, Becker C, Lamb SE. Measuring the psychological outcomes of falling: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:501–510
  3. Daker-White G. Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: a systematic review. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:197–209
  4. de Boer MR, Moll AC, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:257–273
  5. Edwards B, Ung L. Quality of life instruments for caregivers of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25:342–349
  6. Garratt AM, Brealey S, Gillespie WJ. Patient-assessed health instrument for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1414–1423
  7. Hallin P, Sullivan M, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and quality of life measures: a review of instrument psychometric quality. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:509–523
  8. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1651–1668
  9. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Dawes PT. Patient-assessed health in ankylosing spondylitis: a structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:577–586
  10. Dziedzic KS, Thomas E, Hay EM. A systematic search and critical review of measures of disability for use in a population survey of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:1–12
  11. Ettema TP, Droes RM, de Lange J, Mellenbergh GJ, Ribbe MW. A review of quality of life instruments used in dementia. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:675–686
  12. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust . Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205
  13. Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Methodological considerations in functional assessment. J Rheumatol. 1987;14(Suppl 15):6–10
  14. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(Suppl 2):S15–S20
  15. McDowell I, Jenkinson C. Development standards for health measures. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:238–246
  16. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622–629
  17. Kirschner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38:27–36
  18. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. JAMA. 1995;273:59–65
  19. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003;
  20. Apgar V. A proposal for new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32:260–267
  21. Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J R Stat Soc A. 2002;165:233–261
  22. Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:217–222
  23. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:286–299
  24. Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 1994;39:135–140
  25. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989;
  26. de Vet HCW, Ader HJ, Terwee CB, Pouwer F. Are factor analytical techniques appropriately used in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analyses of the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1203–1218
  27. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge; 1993;
  28. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994;
  29. de Vet HCW. Observer reliability and agreement. In:  Armitage P,  Colton T editor. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Boston: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1998;p. 3123–3128
  30. Stratford P. Reliability: consistency or differentiating among subjects?. Phys Ther. 1989;69:299–300
  31. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, Becher JG, Bezemer PD, Verbeek AL. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:571–578
  32. de Vet HCW, Bouter LM, Bezemer PD, Beurskens AJ. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17:479–487
  33. de Boer MR, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Moll AC, Völker-Dieben HJM, van Rens GHMB. Change to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1260–1268
  34. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;307–310
  35. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991;
  36. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:30–46
  37. Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:403–408
  38. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:349–362
  39. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171–178
  40. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:897–906
  41. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307
  42. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, et al. Evaluating quality of life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18:979–992
  43. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986;134:889–895
  44. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415
  45. Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407
  46. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12
  47. L'Insalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MG. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:738–748
  48. Croft P, Pope D, Zonca M, O'Neill T, Silman A. Measurement of shoulder related disability: results of a validation study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53:525–528
  49. Strauss ME. Introduction to the special section on construct validity of psychological tests: 50 years after Cronbach and Meehl (1955). Psychol Assess. 2005;17:395
  50. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:79–93
  51. Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1369–1378
  52. Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:239–246
  53. Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:23
  54. Zou GY. Quantifying responsiveness of quality of life measures without an external criterion. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1545–1552

PII: S0895-4356(06)00174-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 60, Issue 1 , Pages 34-42 , January 2007