Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 59, Issue 5 , Pages 512-520, May 2006

A study of the noninstrumented physical examination of the knee found high observer variability

Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK

Accepted 7 November 2005. published online 15 March 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

This study estimated the inter- and intraobserver reliability of a set of noninstrumented physical examination measures for knee pain in older adults.

Study Design and Setting

Forty-five patients from primary care, and 13 patients from secondary care, were each examined by two out of a team of three physical therapists, and were reexamined by one of these observers 1 month later. The examination items were standardized and included dichotomous, ordinal and continuous variables considered relevant to a primary care context.

Results

For individual dichotomous items, median interobserver and intraobserver agreement (κ) was 0.22 (interquartile range IQR = 0.12–0.35) and 0.41 (IQR = 0.28–0.56) respectively. For ordinally rated variables, weighted kappa ranged from −0.08 to 0.43 for interobserver agreement, and from 0.00 to 0.79 for intraobserver agreement. The median intraclass correlation coefficient for continuous examination variables was 0.80 (range 0.68–0.89) for interobserver agreement, and 0.84 (range 0.67–0.95) for intraobserver agreement.

Conclusion

For trained but nonexpert examiners, agreement was generally poor for dichotomous and ordinal examination items; however, κ-values are liable to be depressed by the low prevalence of clinical signs in this sample. Agreement on continuous variables was notably better.

Keywords: Observer variability, Reliability, Knee, Physical examination

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(05)00397-5

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.004

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 59, Issue 5 , Pages 512-520, May 2006