Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 59, Issue 3 , Page 323 , March 2006

Re: In response to the correspondence arising from Twisk and Proper: evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up

References 

  1. Twisk J, Proper K. Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:223–228
  2. Boshuizen HC. Re: Twisk and Proper: evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up. [Letter] J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:209–210
  3. Twisk J, Proper K. Author reply. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:211–212
  4. Chan SF, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Walter SD. Adjustment for baseline measurement error in randomized controlled trials induces bias. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25:408–416
  5. Senn S. Methods for assessing difference between groups in change when initial measurement is subject to infra-individual variation. [Letter] Stat Med. 1994;13:2280–2285
  6. Senn S. In defence of analysis of covariance: a reply to Chambless and Roeback. [Letter] Stat Med. 1995;14:2283–2285

PII: S0895-4356(05)00342-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.001

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 59, Issue 3 , Page 323 , March 2006

Article Tools