Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 8 , Pages 809-814 , August 2005

Concordance between supervised and postal administration of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was very high

  • Hilary Pinnock

      Affiliations

    • Division of Community Health Sciences, GP Section, University of Edinburgh, 20, West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-(0)131-650-8102; fax: +44-(0)131-650-9519.
  • ,
  • Elizabeth F. Juniper

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Canada
  • ,
  • Aziz Sheikh

      Affiliations

    • Division of Community Health Sciences, GP Section, University of Edinburgh, 20, West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK

,Accepted 7 January 2005.

References 

  1. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment. 1998;2(i–iv):1–74
  2. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient's assessed outcome measures. BMJ. 2002;324:1417–1419
  3. Aaronson NK. Assessing the quality of life of patients in cancer clinical trials: common problems and common sense solutions. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:1304–1307
  4. Erickson P, Taeuber RC, Scott J. Operational aspects of quality-of-life assessment: choosing the right instrument. [Review] Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7:39–48
  5. Strack F, Argyle M, Schwartz N. Subjective well-being: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1991;27–48
  6. Smeeth L, Fletcher AE, Stirling S, Nunes M, Breeze E, Ng E, et al. Randomised comparison of three methods of administering a screening questionnaire to elderly people: findings from the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community. BMJ. 2001;323:1403–1407
  7. Jenkinson C, Ziebland S, Fitzpatrick R, Mowat A, Mowat A. Hospitalization and its influence upon results from health status questionnaires. Int J Health Sci. 1993;4:13–18
  8. Pinnock H, Sheikh A, Juniper EF. Evaluation of intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion. Prim Care Respir J. 2004;13:36–41
  9. Mallinson S. The Short-Form 36 and older people: some problems encountered when using postal administration. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:324–328
  10. Carter J, Mant F, Mant J, Wade D, Winner S. Comparison of the postal version of the Frenchay Activities Index with interviewer-administered version for use in older people with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:131–138
  11. Verrips GHW, Stuifbergen MC, den Ouden AL, Bonsel GJ, Gemke RJBJ, Paneth Nm Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Measuring health status using the health utilities index: agreement between raters and between modalities of administration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:475–481
  12. Frost NA, Sparrow JM, Hopper CD, Peters TJ. Reliability of the VCM1 Questionnaire when administered by post and by telephone. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001;8:1–11
  13. Bremer BA, McCauley CR. Quality of life measures: hospital interview versus home questionnaire. Health Psychol. 1986;5:171–177
  14. Yohannes AM, Greenwood Y, Connolly MJ. Reliability of the Manchester respiratory activities of daily living questionnaire as a postal questionnaire. Age Ageing. 2002;31:355–358
  15. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, Griffith LE. Measuring the quality of life in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:832–838
  16. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:32–38
  17. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) . Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. NHLBI/WHO workshop report. NIH publication no. 02:3659. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; 2002;
  18. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:902–907
  19. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Roberts JN. Measuring asthma control in group studies: do we need airway calibre and rescue β2 agonist use?. Respir Med. 2001;95:319–323
  20. Juniper EF. Asthma quality of life questionnaires: background information and interviewing tips. Hamilton, Ontario: QOL Technologies; 1999;
  21. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:81–87
  22. Pinnock H, Bawden R, Proctor S, Wolfe S, Scullion J, Price D, et al. Accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness in primary care of routine telephone review of asthma: pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326:477–479
  23. Juniper EF, Ståhl E, O'Byrne PM. Minimal important difference for the asthma control questionnaire. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:A642
  24. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:730–735
  25. O'Donoghue MF, Duncan JS, Sander JW. The subjective handicap of epilepsy: a new approach to measuring treatment outcome. Brain. 1998;121:317–343
  26. Caro JJ, Caro I, Caro J, Wouters F, Juniper EF. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation?. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:683–691
  27. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Ferrie PJ, King DR, Roberts JN. Measuring asthma control: clinic questionnaire or daily diary?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;1330–1334
  28. Grootendorst PV, Feeny DH, Furlong W. Does it matter whom you ask and how you ask? Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the Ontario Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:127–135

PII: S0895-4356(05)00107-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.010

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 8 , Pages 809-814 , August 2005