Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 8 , Pages 763-768 , August 2005

For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine

  • Terry P. Klassen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • ,
  • Ba' Pham

      Affiliations

    • BioMedical Data Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 2R7, Canada
    • Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Margaret L. Lawson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • David Moher

      Affiliations

    • Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 2R7, Canada
    • Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 613-738-3591.

,Accepted 30 August 2004.

References 

  1. Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D, Smith R. Evidence Based Medicine: a new journal to help doctors identify the information they need. BMJ. 1995;310:1085–1086
  2. Hardy M, Coulter I, Venuturupalli S, Roth EA, Favreau J, Morton SC, et al. Ayurvedic interventions for Diabetes Mellitus: a systematic review. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E040. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2001;Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/evrptfiles.htm#ayurved
  3. Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, Jüni P, Klassen T, Le Lorier J, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet. 1996;347:363–366
  4. Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Willich S. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:526–531
  5. Lawson ML, Pham B, Klassen TP, Moher D. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:777–788(this issue)
  6. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12
  7. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412
  8. Moher D, Pham B, Lawson M, Klassen TP. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1–90
  9. Kemper KJ, Cassileth B, Ferris T. Holistic pediatrics: a research agenda. Pediatrics. 1999;103:902–909
  10. Pham B, Klassen TP, Lawson ML, Moher D. Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:769–777(this issue).
  11. Jüni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:115–123[Available at: http://ije.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/full/31/1/115]
  12. Tang JL, Zhan SY, Ernst E. Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine. BMJ. 1999;319:160–161
  13. Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, Rees R. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:159–166
  14. Pittler MH, Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Ernst E. Location bias in controlled clinical trials of complementary/alternative therapies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:485–489
  15. Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350:326–329
  16. Quiñones D, Llorca J, Prieto-Salceda D, Delgado-Rodríguez M. Quality of clinical trials published in Spain on asthma in comparison to trials in English language journals. [in Spanish] Arch Bronconeumol. 2002;38:574–579Available at: http://db.doyma.es/cgi-bin/wdbcgi.exe/doyma/mrevista.fulltext?pident=13041171
  17. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials) . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657–662
  18. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694
  19. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L, CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials) . Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA. 2001;285:1992–1995
  20. Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C, CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials) . Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1996–1999
  21. Devereaux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA, Quan H, Guyatt GH. The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Control Clin Trials. 2002;23:380–388
  22. Moher D, Sampson M, Campbell K, Beckner W, Lepage L, Gaboury I, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr [electronic journal]. 2002;2:2;Available at: http://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=55&action=archive

PII: S0895-4356(05)00058-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.020

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 8 , Pages 763-768 , August 2005

Article Tools