Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 6 , Pages 595-602, June 2005

The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome

  • Dianne L. Groll

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 2V7
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 613-549-6666 ext. 3310; fax: 613-544-4238.
    • ,
  • Teresa To

      Affiliations

    • Public Health Sciences, Health Policy Management University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A8
    • ,
  • Claire Bombardier

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2E9
    • ,
  • James G. Wright

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Public Health Sciences, Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto

Accepted 14 October 2004.

Abstract 

Background and Objectives

Physical function is an important measure of success of many medical and surgical interventions. Ability to adjust for comorbid disease is essential in health services research and epidemiologic studies. Current indices have primarily been developed with mortality as the outcome, and are not sensitive enough when the outcome is physical function. The objective of this study was to develop a self-administered Functional Comorbidity Index with physical function as the outcome.

Methods

The index was developed using two databases: a cross-sectional, simple random sample of 9,423 Canadian adults and a sample of 28,349 US adults seeking treatment for spine ailments. The primary outcome measure was the SF-36 physical function (PF) subscale.

Results

The Functional Comorbidity Index, an 18-item list of diagnoses, showed stronger association with physical function (model R2=0.29) compared with the Charlson (model R2=0.18), and Kaplan-Feinstein (model R2=0.07) indices. The Functional Comorbidity Index correctly classified patients into high and low function, in 77% of cases.

Conclusion

This new index contains diagnoses such as arthritis not found on indices used to predict mortality, and the FCI explained more variance in PF scores compared to indices designed to predict mortality.

Keywords: Comorbidity, Index, Measurement, Physical function

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(05)00021-1

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 6 , Pages 595-602, June 2005

Article Tools