Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 6 , Pages 589-594 , June 2005

Members of research ethics committees accepted a modification of the randomized consent design

  • Ron Schellings

      Affiliations

    • Public Health Supervisory Service of the Netherlands, the Inspectorate of Health Care, Parnassusplein 5, 2511 VX The Hague, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 70 3407146; fax: +31 70 3407147.
    • ,
  • Alfons G. Kessels

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyeplein 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Gerben ter Riet

      Affiliations

    • Academic Medical Center, Department of General Practice, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Horten Centre, Zurich University, Postfach Nord, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
    • ,
  • Jos Kleijnen

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, United Kingdom, YO10 5DD
    • ,
  • Pieter Leffers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Maastricht, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • J. André Knottnerus

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Maastricht, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Ferd Sturmans

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dr. Molenwaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

,Accepted 30 November 2004.

References 

  1. Zelen M. Statistical options in clinical trials. Semin Oncol. 1977;4:441–446
  2. Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1242–1245
  3. Altman DG, Whitehead J, Parmar MKB, Stenning SP, Fayers PM, Machin D. Randomised consent designs in cancer clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1934–1944
  4. Anbar D. The relative efficiency of Zelen's prerandomization design for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1983;39:711–718
  5. Matts J, McHugh R. Randomization and efficiency in Zelen's single-consent design. Biometrics. 1987;43:885–894
  6. Ellenberg SS. Randomization designs in comparative clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1404–1408
  7. Beauchamp TL, Cook RR, Fayerweather WE, Raabe GK, Thar WE, Cowles SR, et al. Ethical guidelines for epidemiologists. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:151S–169S
  8. Zelen M. Alternatives to classic randomized trials. Surg Clin N Am. 1981;61:1425–1432
  9. Zelen M. Strategy and alternate randomized designs in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep. 1982;66:1095–1100
  10. Zelen M. Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an update. State Med. 1990;9:645–646
  11. Knottnerus JA. Health care research in ambulatory care. In: Ethiek en recht in de gezondheidszorg (Dutch language). Deventer: Kluwer; 1997;p. IV 151–94
  12. Zelen M. Authors'reply. [letter to the editor] Stat Med. 2002;21:2601–2605
  13. Smith R. Informed consent: the intricacies. BMJ. 1997;314:1059–1060
  14. Informed consent in medical research. [letters] BMJ. 1997;314:14707–14783
  15. Informed consent. [letters] BMJ. 1997;315:247–254
  16. Torgerson DJ, Roland M. What is Zelen's design?. BMJ. 1998;316:606
  17. Smith R. Informed consent: edging forward (and backwards). BMJ. 1998;316:949–951
  18. Homer CS. Using the Zelen design in randomized controlled trials: debates and controversies. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38:200–207
  19. Palmer CR. Ethics, data-dependent designs, and the strategy of clinical trials: time to start learning-as-we-go?. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002;11:381–402
  20. Gezondheidsraad . Informed consent en prerandomisatie. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad; 1999;
  21. Schellings R, Kessels AGH, Riet ter G, Sturmans F. The Zelen design may be the best choice for a heroin-provision experiment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:503–507
  22. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports . WMO: The Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports; 1998;
  23. Department of Health . Local Research Ethics Committees. London: DoH; 1991;
  24. Department of Health . Ethics committee review of multi-centre research. London: DoH; 1997;
  25. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) , Governance arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees . London: Central Office for Research Ethics Committees; 2001;
  26. Osborn DPJ, Fulford KWM. Psychiatric research: what ethical concerns do LRECs encounter? A postal survey. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:55–56
  27. Godfrey E, Wray E, Nicholson R. Another look at LREC annual reports. Bull Med Eth. 2001;171:13–21
  28. Delbecq AL, AH van de Ven, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning; a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview: Scott, Foresman; 1975;
  29. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki . Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2000;284:3043–3045

PII: S0895-4356(04)00370-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.021

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 58, Issue 6 , Pages 589-594 , June 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution