Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 57, Issue 12 , Pages 1219-1222 , December 2004

Discussion: Gold is not always good enough: the shortcomings of randomization when evaluating interventions in small heterogeneous samples

  • Eve Blair

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel. +61-8-9489-7757.

,Accepted 19 June 2004.

References 

  1. Genest J, Pedersen T. Prevention of cardiovascular ischemic events: high risk and secondary prevention. [Review] Circulation. 2003;107:2059–2065
  2. Newnham JP, Evans SF, Michael CA, Stanley FJ, Landau LI. Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1993;342:887–891
  3. McDonald SJ, Prendiville WJ, Blair E. Randomised controlled trial of oxytocin alone versus oxytocin and ergometrine in active management of third stage of labour. [Erratum in BMJ 1993;307:1454.] BMJ. 1993;307:1167–1171
  4. Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:1358–1361
  5. Ottenbacher K. Impact of random assignment on study outcome: an empirical examination. Control Clin Trials. 1992;13:50–61
  6. Taves DR. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974;15:443–453
  7. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31:103–115
  8. Freedman LS, White SJ. On the use of Pocock and Simon's method for balancing treatment numbers over prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1976;32:691–694
  9. White SJ, Freedman LS. Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study. Br J Cancer. 1978;37:849–857
  10. Kallis P, Tooze JA, Talbot S, Cowans D, Bevan DH, Treasure T. Pre-operative aspirin decreases platelet aggregation and increases post-operative blood loss: a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trial in 100 patients with chronic stable angina. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:404–409
  11. Treasure T, MacRae KD. Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials? Randomisation doesn't guarantee similarity of groups; minimisation does. [Editorial] BMJ. 1998;317:362–363
  12. Altman DG, Bland JM. How to randomise. BMJ. 1999;319:703–704
  13. Field D, Elbourne D. The randomized controlled trial. Curr Paediatr. 2003;13:53–57
  14. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1878–1886
  15. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–1892
  16. Weindling AM, Hallam P, Gregg J, Klenka H, Rosenbloom L, Hutton JL. A randomized controlled trial of early physiotherapy for high-risk infants. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85:1107–1111
  17. Corry IS, Cosgrove AP, Walsh EG, McClean D, Graham HK. Botulinum toxin A in the hemiplegic upper limb: A double-blind trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:185–193
  18. Steinbok P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong RW, Cochrane DD, Kestle J. A randomized clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. [Erratum in Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39(11): inside back cover.] Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:178–184
  19. McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, et al. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomized clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:220–232
  20. Ubhi T, Bhakta BB, Ives HL, Allgar V, Roussounis SH. Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of the effect of botulinum toxin on walking in cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:481–487
  21. Troise C, Voltolini S, Canessa A, Pecora S, Negrini AC. Sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria pollen-induced rhinitis: a double-blind study. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1995;5:25–30
  22. Nelson HS, Oppenheimer J, Vatsia GA, Buchmeier A. A double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized cat extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993;92:229–236

PII: S0895-4356(04)00178-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.003

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 57, Issue 12 , Pages 1219-1222 , December 2004

Article Tools