Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 57, Issue 12 , Pages 1295-1304 , December 2004

Hospital chart review provided more accurate comorbidity information than data from a general practitioner survey or an administrative database

  • David B. Preen

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 8 6488 1307; fax: +61 8 6488 1188.
  • ,
  • C. D'Arcy J. Holman

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
  • ,
  • David M. Lawrence

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Developmental Health, Curtin University of Technology, 100 Roberts Road, Subiaco WA 6008, Australia
  • ,
  • Natalya J. Baynham

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
  • ,
  • James B. Semmens

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia

,Accepted 15 March 2004.

References 

  1. O'Connell RL, Lim LL-Y. Utility of Charlson Comorbidity Index computed from routinely collected hospital discharge diagnosis codes. Method Inf Med. 2000;39:7–11
  2. Sibthorpe B, Kliewer E, Smith L. Record linkage in Australian epidemiological research: health benefits, privacy safeguards and future potential. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19:250–256
  3. Holman CDJ, Bass J, Rouse IL, Hobbs MST. Population-based linkage of health records in Western Australia: development of a health services research linked database. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23:453–459
  4. Semmens JB, Lawrence-Brown MMD, Fletcher DR, Rouse IL, Holman CDJ. The Quality of Surgical Care Project: a model to evaluate surgical outcomes in Western Australia using population-based record linkage. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68:397–403
  5. Stanley FJ, Croft M, Gibbins J, Read AW. A population database for maternal and child health research in Western Australia using record linkage. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1994;8:433–447
  6. Brameld KJ, Thomas MAB, Holman CDJ, Bass AJ, Rouse IL. Validation of linked administrative data on end-stage renal failure: application of record linkage to a ‘clinical based population.’. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23:464–467
  7. Ray WA. Policy and program analysis using administrative databases. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:712–718
  8. Jaro MA. Advances in record linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:414–420
  9. Kendrick S, Clarke J. The Scottish Record Linkage System. Health Bull (Edinb). 1993;51:72–79
  10. Newcombe HB. Handbook of record linkage: methods for health and statistical studies, administration and business. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988;
  11. Roos LL, Nicol JP. A research registry: uses, development and accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:39–47
  12. Bergman L, Dekker G, Van Kerkoff EHM, Peterse HL, Van Dongen JA, Van Leeuwen FE. Influence of age and comorbidity on treatment choice and survival in elderly patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991;18:189–198
  13. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients: a clinical severity score. [Erratum in: JAMA1992;268:1860.] JAMA. 1992;267:2344–2348
  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–383
  15. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey R. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27
  16. Ghali WA, Hall RE, Rosen AK, Ash AS, Moskowitz MA. Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:273–278
  17. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075–1079
  18. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records of chronic diseases in middle-aged and elderly Finnish men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:762–769
  19. Silliman RA, Lash TL. Comparison of interview-based and medical-record-based indices of comorbidity among breast cancer patients. Med Care. 1999;37:339–349
  20. Powell H, Lim LL-Y, Heller RF. Accuracy of administrative data to assess comorbidity in patients with heart disease: an Australian perspective. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:687–693
  21. National Health and Medical Research Council . Act of statutory basis for the conduct of research. NHMRC 1999; National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Canberra, ACT: Aus Info; 2000;Available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/human/contents.htm
  22. Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Wright JG, Paul JE, Bombardier C. Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:265–273
  23. Newschaffer CJ, Bush TL, Penberthy LT. Comorbidity measurement in elderly female breast cancer patients with administrative and medical records data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:725–733
  24. Roos LL, Fisher ES, Sharp SM, Newhouse JP, Anderson G, Bubolz TA. Postsurgical mortality in Manitoba and New England. JAMA. 1990;263:2453–2458
  25. Gee V, Daws V. Validation Study of the Western Australian Midwives' Notification System 1992. Perth: Western Australian Department of Health; 1994;
  26. D'Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1429–1433
  27. Preen DB, Bailey B, Wright A. Smoother patient transition from hospital to community. Perth: Western Australian Department of Health; 2002;Available at http://www.health.wa.gov.au/safetyandquality/docs/gpdwa%5Fsmoother%5Fpatient%5Ftransition.pdf
  28. Medical Board of Western Australia. Duties of a Medical Practitioner Registered with the Medical Board of Western Australia [Internet]. Medical Board policy; issued August 2003. Available at http://www.wa.medicalboard.com.au/pdfs/DutiesOfADoctor.pdf.
  29. Lee LA, Eagar KM, Smith MC. Subacute and non-acute casemix in Australia. Med J Aust. 1998;169(Suppl):S22–S25
  30. Bloom AL. The funding of private hospitals in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2002;25(1):19–39
  31. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing . The Australian Health Care System: an outline. [Internet] Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing; September 2000;Available at http://www7.health.gov.au/haf/ozhealth/
  32. Department of Health and Aged Care . Health: Health Care Delivery and Financing. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics Report; 2002;Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@nsf/0/2955A5EC4F53191FCA256DEA00053974?Open
  33. Malenka DJ, McLerran D, Roos N, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Using administrative data to describe casemix: a comparison with the medical record. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1027–1032
  34. Romano PS, Roos LL, Luft HS, Jollis JG, Doliszny K. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:249–260

PII: S0895-4356(04)00172-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.016

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 57, Issue 12 , Pages 1295-1304 , December 2004