Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 57, Issue 6 , Pages 620-623 , June 2004

Female specialists were more likely to respond to a postal questionnaire about drug treatments for Alzheimer disease

  • Mark Oremus

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, S.M.B.D. Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste.-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-514-340-8222, x4717; fax: +1-514-340-7564.
    • ,
  • Christina Wolfson

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, S.M.B.D. Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste.-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

,Accepted 20 November 2003.

References 

  1. Kaner EFS, Haighton CA, McAvoy BR. “So much post, so busy with practice—so, no time!”: a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:1067–1069
  2. Stocks N, Gunnell D. What are the characteristics of general practitioners who routinely do not return postal questionnaires: a cross sectional study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:940–941
  3. Sibbald B, Addington-Hall J, Brenneman D, Freeling P. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:297–300
  4. Armstrong D, Ashworth M. When questionnaire response rates do matter: a survey of general practitioners and their views of NHS changes. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:479–480
  5. Barclay S, Todd C, Finlay I, Grande G, Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract. 2002;19:105–111
  6. Bostick RM, Pirie P, Luepker RV, Kofron PM. Using physician caller follow-ups to improve the response rate to a physician telephone survey. Eval Health Prof. 1992;15:420–433
  7. Iglesias C, Torgerson D. Does length of questionnaire matter? A randomised trial of response rates to a mailed questionnaire. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5:219–221
  8. Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1117–1122
  9. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002;324:1183–1191
  10. Guadagnoli E, Cunningham S. The effects of nonresponse and late response on a survey of physician attitudes. Eval Health Prof. 1989;12:318–328
  11. Sobal J, Ferentz KS. Comparing physicians' responses to the first and second mailings of a questionnaire. Eval Health Prof. 1989;12:329–339
  12. Swarztrauber K, Vickrey BG, Mittman BS. Physicians' preferences for specialty involvement in the care of patients with neurological conditions. Med Care. 2002;40:1196–1209
  13. McAvoy BR, Kaner EFS. General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?. BMJ. 1996;313:732–733
  14. Cartwright A. Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961–77. BMJ. 1978;2:1419–1421

PII: S0895-4356(03)00424-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.008

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 57, Issue 6 , Pages 620-623 , June 2004

Article Tools