Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 11 , Pages 1084-1091, November 2003

Regression dilution of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with established cerebrovascular disease

  • S.C Howard
  • ,
  • P.M Rothwell

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 44-1865-224237; fax: 44-1865-790493.
  • ,
  • on behalf of the Cerebrovascular Cohort Studies Collaboration

Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, WoodStock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK

Accepted 18 November 2002.

Abstract 

Background and objective

Blood pressure (BP) is a major risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular events. To quantify its effect, it is necessary to correct for regression dilution bias (RDB). RDB has been estimated from repeated measurements of BP in population-based studies, but there are no data in patients with established vascular disease.

Method

We analyzed repeat measurements of BP from three large studies of patients with cerebrovascular disease: UK-TIA trial (n=2098), Dutch TIA trial (n=2953), and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (n=2646). The regression dilution ratio (RDR) was estimated by parametric and nonparametric methods at follow-up intervals ranging from 4 months to 6 years.

Results

After an interval of only 4–5 months, nonparametric RDRs of 0.56, 0.40, and 0.45 for systolic BP and 0.45, 0.33, and 0.31 for diastolic BP were observed in the three studies, respectively. These values are much smaller than those reported in population-based studies, indicating greater within-person variability in BP.

Conclusion

RDRs from population-based studies cannot necessarily be applied to cohorts with established vascular disease.

Keywords:  Systolic blood pressure, Diastolic blood pressure, Regression dilution, Cerebrovascular disease

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(03)00267-1

doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00267-1

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 11 , Pages 1084-1091, November 2003