Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 12 , Pages 1192-1201, December 2003

A changing relationship between disability and survival in the elderly population: differences by age

  • Rosa Lamarca

      Affiliations

    • Health Services Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM-IMAS), Carrer del Doctor Aiguader 80, Barcelona E-08003, Spain
  • ,
  • Montserrat Ferrer

      Affiliations

    • Health Services Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM-IMAS), Carrer del Doctor Aiguader 80, Barcelona E-08003, Spain
  • ,
  • Per Kragh Andersen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Knut Liestol

      Affiliations

    • Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, PB 1080 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Sweden
  • ,
  • Niels Keiding

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Jordi Alonso

      Affiliations

    • Health Services Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM-IMAS), Carrer del Doctor Aiguader 80, Barcelona E-08003, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +34-93-225-7553; fax: +34-93-221-4002.

Accepted 22 November 2002.

Abstract 

Background

Longitudinal studies estimating the association between disability and mortality in the elderly population have typically assumed disability constant through the follow-up study period. Current knowledge indicates that such assumptions may not be appropriate. Our purpose was to examine this association (disability and mortality) taking into account the transitions in the disablement process.

Methods

1,294 participants (aged 65 and over) in the Health Interview Survey of Barcelona were followed up for a median of 8 years. Nine basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were measured at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Individuals were defined as “dependent” if they reported not being able to perform one or more of the activities without assistance. Survival analysis with delayed entry, age as the time variable, and disability as a time-dependent variable was performed.

Results

The rates of disability had increased by the end of the follow-up (from 42.0 to 60.0% among women and from 30.0 to 48.0%, among men); 7.5% of disabled women at baseline and 28.5% of men recovered from disability. The adjusted relative risk of dying for those with basic ADLs dependency varied with age: at 80 years of age it was 3.5 for women and 1.8 for men, while at 90 years it was 1.9 and 1.2, respectively.

Conclusions

Disability increases monotonically over time while the risk of mortality associated with disability varies with gender and age. Elderly disabled women should be considered a target group for intervention because they show higher rates of disability and are less likely to recover from disability. Our results illustrate the need to consider disability status as a time-dependent variable, to avoid an underestimation of its association with mortality.

Keywords:  Aging, Activities of daily living, Disability, Follow-up studies, Survival, Proportional hazards model

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(03)00201-4

doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00201-4

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology March 2004 (Vol. 57, Issue 3, Page 324)

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 12 , Pages 1192-1201, December 2003