Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 7 , Pages 636-645, July 2003

Development of a clinical decision rule for triage of women with palpable breast masses

  • Mathew J. Reeves

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 4660 S. Hagadorn Road, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 517-353-8623; fax: 517-432-1130.
  • ,
  • Janet Rose Osuch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 4660 S. Hagadorn Road, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
    • Department of Surgery, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Dorothy R. Pathak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 4660 S. Hagadorn Road, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
    • Department of Family Practice, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

Abstract 

Background and Objective: Given the large numbers of open breast biopsies performed in women who have benign breast masses, we developed a clinical decision rule (CDR), called BREASTAID, to triage women into open biopsy or follow-up.

Methods: A prospective cohort design was used to obtain data on 452 palpable breast masses evaluated at a referral clinic. Breast cancer was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer at open biopsy. Separate logistic regression models were developed at three logical stages of the clinical workup. Bayes' theorem was applied in a stepwise fashion to revise model probabilities to generate a final probability of cancer. Receiver operator characteristics curves were generated to determine the optimum cut-point. Results derived from the CDR were compared with actual clinical practice.

Results: A total of 452 masses in 380 women were included. Clinical practice resulted in 180 masses (39.8%) undergoing open biopsy, 41 (22.8%) of which were cancers. Age, history of breast cancer in the mother, mass size, mammography findings, and fine needle aspiration biopsy results were included in the final models. When applied to the derivation dataset, BREASTAID successfully identified 40 of 41 cancer masses (sensitivity 97.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 94.1–99.9), and 350 of 411 noncancer masses (specificity 85.2%, 95% CI 81.8–88.5). BREASTAID would have reduced the number of biopsies performed on the 411 benign masses from 139 to 61.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a CDR based on routinely collected clinical variables has the potential to accurately triage women with palpable breast masses. Further validation of the rule is required before its clinical use can be considered.

Keywords:  Breast cancer, Clinical decision rule, Predictive models, Logistic regression

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(03)00123-9

doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00123-9

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 7 , Pages 636-645, July 2003