Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 7 , Pages 622-628, July 2003

Characteristics of the modified mini-mental state exam among elderly persons

  • Shari S Bassuk

      Affiliations

    • Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East, Boston, MA 02215, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 617-278-0814; fax: 617-731-3843.
  • ,
  • Jane M Murphy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract 

This study assesses psychometric properties of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and present population norms and demographic risk factors for low 3MS scores. The subjects were 885 persons aged 65 and older who took the 3MS as part of the Stirling County Study, a population-based longitudinal study of adult residents of a county in Atlantic Canada. 3MS scores were not dependent on the specific rater who scored the test; thus, the 3MS is free of rater bias. Interrater reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.98), as was internal consistency (coefficient alpha=0.91). Test-retest reliability over 3 years was 0.78. One third of subjects tested as cognitively impaired. Risk factors for low scores include older age, less education, male gender, and examination in French. The correlation between 3MS and Mini Mental State Exam scores was 0.95. The 3MS can be used as an epidemiologic measure of global cognitive performance among elderly persons.

Keywords:  Aged, Cognition, Mental status tests, Psychometrics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(03)00111-2

doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00111-2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 56, Issue 7 , Pages 622-628, July 2003