Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 54, Issue 5 , Pages 475-481, May 2001

Measuring health status using the Health Utilities Index:

Agreement between raters and between modalities of administration

  • G.H.W Verrips

      Affiliations

    • TNO Prevention and Health, P.O. Box 2215, 2301 Leiden, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 71 518 1704; fax: +31 71 518 1920.(G.H.W. Verrips)
  • ,
  • M.C Stuifbergen

      Affiliations

    • TNO Prevention and Health, P.O. Box 2215, 2301 Leiden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • A.L den Ouden

      Affiliations

    • TNO Prevention and Health, P.O. Box 2215, 2301 Leiden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • G.J Bonsel

      Affiliations

    • Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • R.J.B.J Gemke

      Affiliations

    • Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • N Paneth

      Affiliations

    • Michigan State University, East-Lansing, MI, USA
  • ,
  • S.P Verloove-Vanhorick

      Affiliations

    • TNO Prevention and Health, P.O. Box 2215, 2301 Leiden, The Netherlands

Received 6 October 1999; received in revised form 31 July 2000; accepted 2 August 2000.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to evaluate interrater and intermodality agreement in assessing health status using the Health Utilities Index. A random sample from a Dutch cohort of 14-year-old Very Low Birth Weight children and their parents were invited to participate in a face-to-face (n = 150) or telephone (n = 150) interview. All 300 participants were also sent a questionnaire by mail. Response rate was 68%. Interrater and intermodality agreement were high for the physical HUI3 attributes and poor for the psychological attributes. Children and parents reported more dysfunction in the psychological attributes when interviewed than when completing the mailed questionnaire. High agreement on the physical attributes may have resulted from the fact that hardly any dysfunction was reported in these attributes, and poor agreement in the psychological attributes may have been a result of the fact that in these attributes much more dysfunction was reported. In measuring children's health status using the HUI3, the results and their interpretation vary with the source of information and the modality of administration. For maximum comparability between studies, written self-report questionnaires seem the preferred option.

Keywords:  Health status, Children, Proxy, Agreement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(00)00317-6

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 54, Issue 5 , Pages 475-481, May 2001