Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 54, Issue 1 , Pages 99-103, January 2001

A note on R2 measures for Poisson and logistic regression models when both models are applicable

Department of Medical Computer Sciences, Section of Clinical Biometrics, University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Received 3 January 2000; received in revised form 23 May 2000; accepted 15 June 2000.

Abstract 

The aim of many epidemiological studies is the regression of a dichotomous outcome (e.g., death or affection by a certain disease) on prognostic covariables. Thereby the Poisson regression model is often used alternatively to the logistic regression model. Modelling the number of events and individual outcomes, respectively, both models lead to nearly the same results concerning the parameter estimates and their significances. However, when calculating the proportion of explained variation, quantified by an R2 measure, a large difference between both models usually occurs. We illustrate this difference by an example and explain it with theoretical arguments. We conclude, the R2 measure of the Poisson regression quantifies the predictability of event rates, but it is not adequate to quantify the predictability of the outcome of individual observations.

Keywords:  R2 measure, Poisson regression, Logistic regression, Approximation, Deviance, Sums-of-squares

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(00)00292-4

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 54, Issue 1 , Pages 99-103, January 2001