Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 53, Issue 9 , Pages 964-972 , September 2000

What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?

  • David Moher

      Affiliations

    • Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Pediatrics, Epidemiology, and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Room R226, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada. Tel: (613) 738-3591; fax: (613) 738-4869.
    • ,
  • Pham

      Affiliations

    • Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Terry P Klassen

      Affiliations

    • Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Pediatrics, Epidemiology, and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Kenneth F Schulz

      Affiliations

    • Family Health International, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
    • ,
  • Jesse A Berlin

      Affiliations

    • Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
    • ,
  • Alejandro R Jadad

      Affiliations

    • Health Information Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Alessandro Liberati

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Epidemiology, Mario Negri Institute, Milan, Italy

Received 22 June 1999 ,Accepted 5 January 2000.

References 

  1. Grégoire G, Derderian F, LeLorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis (is there a tower of babel bias?). J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(1):159–163
  2. Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, Juni P, Kiassen T, Le Lorier J, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English (Implications for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews). Lancet. 1996;347:363–366
  3. Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (is blinding necessary?). Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12
  4. Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350:326–329
  5. Moher D, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Tugwell P, Moher M, Jones A, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials (implications for the conduct of meta-analyses). Health Technology Assessment. 1999;3(12):1–98
  6. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, Klassen TP, Tugwell P, Moher M, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (A comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals). JAMA. 1998;280:278–280
  7. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet. 1998;352:609–613
  8. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1271–1278
  9. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons;; 1986;p. 1–32.
  10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174
  11. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias (Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials). JAMA. 1995;273:408–412
  12. Poynard T, Naveau S, Mory B, Chaput JC. Meta-analysis of smooth muscle relaxants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1994;8:499–510
  13. Chalmers TC, Berrier J, Sacks HS, Levin H, Reitman D, Nagalingam R. Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II (Replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree). Stat Med. 1987;6:733–744
  14. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. Beta-blockade during and after myocardial infarction (an overview of the randomized trials). Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985;27:335–371
  15. Dickersin K, Higgins K, Meinert CL. Identification of meta-analyses (The need for standard terminology). Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:52–66
  16. Tramer M, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis (a case study). BMJ. 1997;315:635–640
  17. Khan KS, Daya S, Collins JA, Walter S. Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research (Overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measure). Fertil Steril. 1996;65:939–945
  18. Berlin JA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses?. Lancet. 1997;350:185–186
  19. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA. 1998;279:1566–1570
  20. Simes RJ. Publication bias (the case for an international registry of clinical trials). J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:1529–1541
  21. Moher D, Pham B, Ausejo M, Saenz A, Hood SC, Barber G. Pharmacological management of intermittent claudication (a meta-analysis of randomized trials). Drugs. 2000;59:1057–1070
  22. Shea B, Dubé C, Moher D. Assessing the quality of reports of meta-analyses: a systematic review of scales and checklists. In: Egger M, Altman D, Smith GD, editors. Systematic Reviews in Health Care, 2nd edition. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group, In press.
  23. Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Vandenbroucke JP. Effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on respiratory tract infections and mortality in the intensive care unit. Lancet. 1991;338:859–862
  24. Thülig B, Hartenauer U, Diemer W, Lawin P, Fegeler W, Kehrel R, et al. Selektive Florasuppression zur Infektionskontrolle in der Operativen Intensivmedizin. Anästh Intensivther Notfallmed. 1989;24:345–354
  25. Anonymous . Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract Trialsts' Collaborative Group. BMJ. 1993;307:525–532
  26. Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions (a systematic qualitative review of their methodology). J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:235–243
  27. Shea B, Moher D, Pham B, Tugwell P. Assessing the quality of reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Poster presentation at the VII Cochrane Colloquium, Rome, Italy, 5–9 October 1999.
  28. Begg CB, Cho MK, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (The CONSORT statement). JAMA. 1996;276:637–639
  29. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D, for the QUOROM group. Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896–1900.
  30. Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, Rees R. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:159–166
  31. Tang JL, Zhan SY, Ernst E. Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine. BMJ. 1999;319:160–161

PII: S0895-4356(00)00188-8

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 53, Issue 9 , Pages 964-972 , September 2000

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution