Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 2 , Pages 173-182, February 1996

Proxy response patterns among the aged: Effects on estimates of health status and medical care utilization from the 1982–1984 long-term care surveys

Center for Demographic Studies, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Received in revised form 25 April 1995

Abstract 

We examined the use of proxies in samples of persons aged 65 years and over from the 1982 and 1984 National Long-Term Care Surveys (NLTCS). The NLTCS are designed to describe the Medicare-enrolled elderly population, their health and functioning, hospital, home health, and institutional use. The NLTCS, being longitudinal, allows trends in functional and health status to be examined as well as the changing character of community-based and institutional services used by chronically disabled persons aged 65 years and older. In analyses of proxy responses there was little evidence of differences in accuracy between self- and proxy reports in persons with different health and functional characteristics. The amount and type of proxy reporting did depend on the health and functional characteristics of the sample person. The cognitively impaired, and the frail elderly, had high levels of proxy use as well as small differences in the accuracy of reporting service use and program enrollment. The results are consistent with methodological studies of proxy reporting in health surveys of other populations [1,2].

Keywords:  Longitudinal analysis, proxy respondent, multivariate analysis, health and functioning, frail

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The research was supported by NIA Grant No. R37AG07198.

PII: 0895-4356(95)00507-2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 2 , Pages 173-182, February 1996